<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title>awaited.dev · Appunti pratici su IA e sviluppo software</title><description>Release di modelli, benchmark, esperimenti e guide per sviluppatori che lavorano con l’IA ogni giorno. Scritto a partire dall’uso reale, con fonti per ogni affermazione.</description><link>https://awaited.dev/it/</link><language>it</language><atom:link href="https://awaited.dev/it/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><managingEditor>contact@awaited.dev (A.M.)</managingEditor><generator>Astro</generator><docs>https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs><item><title>Sono combattuto tra Claude e Codex</title><link>https://awaited.dev/it/experiments/claude-vs-codex-large-features/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/it/experiments/claude-vs-codex-large-features/</guid><description>Codex mi offre più utilizzo, frontend migliori e un’app più fluida. Claude però completa le mie grandi feature multi-agente in poche ore, non in un giorno.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/it/experiments/claude-vs-codex-large-features.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>experiments</category><category>claude</category><category>codex</category><category>fable-5</category><category>gpt-5-6</category><category>multi-agent</category><category>coding-agents</category></item><item><title>Opus 5 non è così male come dice internet</title><link>https://awaited.dev/it/guides/opus-5-workflow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/it/guides/opus-5-workflow/</guid><description>Dopo cinque settimane d&apos;uso quotidiano, Opus 5 mi sembra molto meglio della sua fama online. Piani chiari e attività brevi mostrano quanto vale nel codice.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/it/guides/opus-5-workflow.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>guides</category><category>opus-5</category><category>fable-5</category><category>claude-code</category><category>coding-agents</category><category>context-management</category></item><item><title>Codex Plus può fermarti con ancora l&apos;84% della quota settimanale</title><link>https://awaited.dev/it/releases/codex-plus-five-hour-cap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/it/releases/codex-plus-five-hour-cap/</guid><description>Il limite di cinque ore di Codex Plus può interrompere una sessione anche quando resta l&apos;84% della quota settimanale. Ecco cosa sappiamo davvero.</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/it/releases/codex-plus-five-hour-cap.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>releases</category><category>openai</category><category>codex</category><category>chatgpt-work</category><category>usage-limits</category><category>plus</category></item><item><title>Cursor non ha rimosso l’IDE. Ecco come riaverlo</title><link>https://awaited.dev/it/guides/cursor-agent-window-vs-editor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/it/guides/cursor-agent-window-vs-editor/</guid><description>Agents Window può aprirsi per prima, ma Editor Window resta disponibile. Ti mostro i comandi e l’impostazione di avvio per tornare subito al codice.</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/it/guides/cursor-agent-window-vs-editor.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>guides</category><category>cursor</category><category>coding-agents</category><category>agent-window</category><category>code-review</category><category>worktrees</category></item><item><title>Gli agenti di OpenAI hanno trasformato Artifactory in una bacheca</title><link>https://awaited.dev/it/guides/openai-agents-shared-message-board/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/it/guides/openai-agents-shared-message-board/</guid><description>Gli agenti interni di OpenAI hanno usato Artifactory per coordinarsi e raggiungere Internet. L&apos;incidente mostra perché una sandbox richiede più controlli.</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/it/guides/openai-agents-shared-message-board.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>guides</category><category>openai</category><category>ai-agents</category><category>agent-security</category><category>sandbox</category><category>hugging-face</category></item><item><title>Claude avrà un watermark nel testo. Il motivo è l&apos;UE</title><link>https://awaited.dev/it/releases/claude-text-watermark/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/it/releases/claude-text-watermark/</guid><description>I modelli Claude marcheranno il testo con le parole che scelgono, senza caratteri nascosti. Il motivo è l&apos;AI Act europeo, non la guerra della distillazione.</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/it/releases/claude-text-watermark.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>releases</category><category>anthropic</category><category>claude</category><category>watermarking</category><category>eu-ai-act</category><category>synthid</category><category>distillation</category></item><item><title>Astra è reale. GPT-6 non esce questa settimana</title><link>https://awaited.dev/it/releases/openai-astra-gpt-6-rumors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/it/releases/openai-astra-gpt-6-rumors/</guid><description>OpenAI ha confermato Astra e poi ne ha rallentato i lavori per il rischio cyber. La presunta data di GPT-6 viene da un leak ritirato e una battuta.</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/it/releases/openai-astra-gpt-6-rumors.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>releases</category><category>openai</category><category>astra</category><category>gpt-6</category><category>gpt-5-6</category><category>codex</category><category>agentic-coding</category></item><item><title>I reset di Codex erano solo marketing. Il problema era reale</title><link>https://awaited.dev/it/releases/codex-usage-resets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/it/releases/codex-usage-resets/</guid><description>OpenAI ha azzerato cinque volte i limiti di Codex mentre Sol consumava più del previsto. Per me quelle ricariche gratuite hanno nascosto il vero problema.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/it/releases/codex-usage-resets.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>releases</category><category>openai</category><category>codex</category><category>gpt-5-6</category><category>sol</category><category>usage-limits</category><category>pricing</category></item><item><title>Quale merchant of record scegliere? Ne ho confrontati 9</title><link>https://awaited.dev/it/guides/choosing-a-merchant-of-record/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/it/guides/choosing-a-merchant-of-record/</guid><description>Paddle è il mio merchant of record predefinito, ma il prezzo conta solo in parte. Confronto nove fornitori per costi, recensioni, riserve e requisiti.</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/it/guides/choosing-a-merchant-of-record.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>guides</category><category>merchant-of-record</category><category>payments</category><category>paddle</category><category>stripe</category><category>saas</category></item><item><title>DeepSeek V4 Flash perde 9 benchmark su 9 contro Opus 4.8</title><link>https://awaited.dev/it/releases/deepseek-v4-flash-vs-opus-4-8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/it/releases/deepseek-v4-flash-vs-opus-4-8/</guid><description>V4 Flash costa 0,14 $ in ingresso e 0,28 $ in uscita per milione di token. Ho verificato se lo sconto dal 97 al 99% compensa le sconfitte nei benchmark.</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/it/releases/deepseek-v4-flash-vs-opus-4-8.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>releases</category><category>deepseek</category><category>deepseek-v4-flash</category><category>opus-4-8</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>open-weights</category><category>pricing</category></item><item><title>Come ottenere i primi 1.000 utenti senza pubblicità</title><link>https://awaited.dev/it/guides/first-1000-users-without-paid-ads/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/it/guides/first-1000-users-without-paid-ads/</guid><description>Ho studiato le storie di fondatori su Reddit e trovato sette metodi pratici per ottenere i primi utenti senza pubblicità, oltre agli usi davvero utili dell’IA.</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/it/guides/first-1000-users-without-paid-ads.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>guides</category><category>distribution</category><category>organic-growth</category><category>startups</category><category>ai</category><category>saas</category></item><item><title>Benchmark AI: punteggi simili, modelli molto diversi</title><link>https://awaited.dev/it/benchmarks/why-ai-benchmarks-miss-model-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/it/benchmarks/why-ai-benchmarks-miss-model-quality/</guid><description>DeepSWE mette Luna Max 2,2 punti dietro Sol High a circa un sesto del costo per tentativo. Spiego perché nei repository i due modelli restano molto diversi.</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/it/benchmarks/why-ai-benchmarks-miss-model-quality.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>benchmarks</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>coding-agents</category><category>model-evaluation</category><category>gpt-5-6</category></item><item><title>I miei agenti di coding dimenticano il repo. Gli do una mappa</title><link>https://awaited.dev/it/guides/context-management-for-coding-agents/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/it/guides/context-management-for-coding-agents/</guid><description>Ho creato un sistema di gestione del contesto in quattro livelli che porta gli agenti ai dati aggiornati. Funziona, ma mantenerlo corretto resta difficile.</description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/it/guides/context-management-for-coding-agents.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>guides</category><category>context-management</category><category>coding-agents</category><category>claude-code</category><category>agents-md</category><category>documentation</category><category>vibe-coding</category></item><item><title>Kimi K3 eguaglia GPT-5.6, ma richiede 4,6 volte il tempo</title><link>https://awaited.dev/it/benchmarks/kimi-k3-glm-5-2-hype-check/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/it/benchmarks/kimi-k3-glm-5-2-hype-check/</guid><description>Kimi K3 pareggia GPT-5.6 medium, ma richiede 4,6 volte il tempo. GLM-5.2 costa poco per token e molto per task. Verifico dove entrambi hanno ancora senso.</description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/it/benchmarks/kimi-k3-glm-5-2-hype-check.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>benchmarks</category><category>kimi-k3</category><category>glm-5-2</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>coding-agents</category><category>open-weights</category><category>pricing</category></item><item><title>GPT-5.6 vs Claude 5: perché i benchmark discordano</title><link>https://awaited.dev/it/benchmarks/gpt-5-6-vs-claude-5-benchmarks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/it/benchmarks/gpt-5-6-vs-claude-5-benchmarks/</guid><description>Ho confrontato Sol, Terra, Opus 5 e Fable 5 nei benchmark di coding. Il vincitore cambia a seconda del task, dell&apos;effort, dell&apos;agente e del budget.</description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/it/benchmarks/gpt-5-6-vs-claude-5-benchmarks.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>benchmarks</category><category>gpt-5-6</category><category>opus-5</category><category>fable-5</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>coding-agents</category><category>reasoning-effort</category></item><item><title>Ho confrontato 8 alternative a Convex. Non lascio Convex</title><link>https://awaited.dev/it/guides/convex-alternatives/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/it/guides/convex-alternatives/</guid><description>Appwrite e InsForge ci sono andati vicini, ma Convex resta il backend più semplice per i miei agenti AI. Il vero problema è il costo dell&apos;hosting nell&apos;UE.</description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/it/guides/convex-alternatives.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>guides</category><category>convex</category><category>supabase</category><category>appwrite</category><category>insforge</category><category>backend</category><category>vibe-coding</category></item><item><title>GPT-5.6 Sol complica troppo il codice. Io continuo a usarlo</title><link>https://awaited.dev/it/experiments/gpt-5-6-sol-overengineering/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/it/experiments/gpt-5-6-sol-overengineering/</guid><description>Nel mio audit, GPT-5.6 Sol ha prodotto quasi sei volte più segnalazioni di Fable 5. Molte erano rumore, così ho cambiato il modo in cui lo uso nei progetti.</description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/it/experiments/gpt-5-6-sol-overengineering.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>experiments</category><category>gpt-5-6</category><category>sol</category><category>openai</category><category>codex</category><category>fable-5</category><category>multi-agent</category></item><item><title>Opus 5 è un ottimo dipendente, ma un capo frustrante</title><link>https://awaited.dev/it/releases/opus-5-great-employee-bad-boss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/it/releases/opus-5-great-employee-bad-boss/</guid><description>Opus 5 eguaglia Fable 5 nei benchmark e costa la metà per token, ma supervisionarlo è frustrante. Ecco perché Fable merita ancora il ruolo di capo.</description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/it/releases/opus-5-great-employee-bad-boss.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>releases</category><category>opus-5</category><category>fable-5</category><category>anthropic</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>claude-code</category></item></channel></rss>