<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title>awaited.dev · Notas práticas sobre IA e desenvolvimento de software</title><description>Lançamentos de modelos, benchmarks, experimentos e guias para quem programa com IA todos os dias. Escrito a partir do uso real, com fontes para cada afirmação.</description><link>https://awaited.dev/pt/</link><language>pt</language><atom:link href="https://awaited.dev/pt/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><managingEditor>contact@awaited.dev (A.M.)</managingEditor><generator>Astro</generator><docs>https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs><item><title>Estou dividido entre o Claude e o Codex</title><link>https://awaited.dev/pt/experiments/claude-vs-codex-large-features/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/pt/experiments/claude-vs-codex-large-features/</guid><description>O Codex dá-me mais utilização, melhor frontend e uma aplicação mais simples. Mas o Claude conclui grandes funcionalidades multiagente muito mais depressa.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/pt/experiments/claude-vs-codex-large-features.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>experiments</category><category>claude</category><category>codex</category><category>fable-5</category><category>gpt-5-6</category><category>multi-agent</category><category>coding-agents</category></item><item><title>O Opus 5 não é tão mau como a internet diz</title><link>https://awaited.dev/pt/guides/opus-5-workflow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/pt/guides/opus-5-workflow/</guid><description>Após cinco semanas de uso diário, acho o Opus 5 muito melhor do que a reputação online sugere. Planos claros e tarefas menores revelam um excelente modelo.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/pt/guides/opus-5-workflow.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>guides</category><category>opus-5</category><category>fable-5</category><category>claude-code</category><category>coding-agents</category><category>context-management</category></item><item><title>Codex Plus pode parar o trabalho com 84% da quota semanal por usar</title><link>https://awaited.dev/pt/releases/codex-plus-five-hour-cap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/pt/releases/codex-plus-five-hour-cap/</guid><description>O limite de cinco horas pode interromper trabalho no Codex apesar da quota semanal. Limita quando você pode usar o Plus, não necessariamente a utilização total.</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/pt/releases/codex-plus-five-hour-cap.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>releases</category><category>openai</category><category>codex</category><category>chatgpt-work</category><category>usage-limits</category><category>plus</category></item><item><title>O Cursor não removeu o IDE. Saiba como recuperá-lo</title><link>https://awaited.dev/pt/guides/cursor-agent-window-vs-editor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/pt/guides/cursor-agent-window-vs-editor/</guid><description>Agents Window pode abrir primeiro no Cursor, mas Editor Window continua disponível. Reúno os comandos e a definição que voltam a pôr o código à sua frente.</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/pt/guides/cursor-agent-window-vs-editor.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>guides</category><category>cursor</category><category>coding-agents</category><category>agent-window</category><category>code-review</category><category>worktrees</category></item><item><title>Agentes da OpenAI fizeram do Artifactory um quadro de mensagens</title><link>https://awaited.dev/pt/guides/openai-agents-shared-message-board/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/pt/guides/openai-agents-shared-message-board/</guid><description>Agentes internos da OpenAI usaram o Artifactory para comunicar e aceder à Internet. O incidente mostra por que razão uma sandbox precisa de vários controlos.</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/pt/guides/openai-agents-shared-message-board.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>guides</category><category>openai</category><category>ai-agents</category><category>agent-security</category><category>sandbox</category><category>hugging-face</category></item><item><title>O Claude vai usar marcas de água no texto. A razão é a UE</title><link>https://awaited.dev/pt/releases/claude-text-watermark/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/pt/releases/claude-text-watermark/</guid><description>Os modelos Claude vão marcar o texto pelas palavras que escolhem, não com caracteres ocultos. A razão é o AI Act da UE, não a guerra da destilação.</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/pt/releases/claude-text-watermark.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>releases</category><category>anthropic</category><category>claude</category><category>watermarking</category><category>eu-ai-act</category><category>synthid</category><category>distillation</category></item><item><title>O Astra é real. O GPT-6 não chega esta semana</title><link>https://awaited.dev/pt/releases/openai-astra-gpt-6-rumors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/pt/releases/openai-astra-gpt-6-rumors/</guid><description>A OpenAI confirmou o Astra e abrandou o trabalho por risco cibernético. A data do GPT-6 veio de uma alegação retirada no dia seguinte e de uma piada do Codex.</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/pt/releases/openai-astra-gpt-6-rumors.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>releases</category><category>openai</category><category>astra</category><category>gpt-6</category><category>gpt-5-6</category><category>codex</category><category>agentic-coding</category></item><item><title>Os resets do Codex foram puro marketing. O problema era real</title><link>https://awaited.dev/pt/releases/codex-usage-resets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/pt/releases/codex-usage-resets/</guid><description>A OpenAI repôs a utilização do Codex 5 vezes em dez dias enquanto o Sol consumia os limites depressa demais. Para mim, os reforços esconderam o problema real.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/pt/releases/codex-usage-resets.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>releases</category><category>openai</category><category>codex</category><category>gpt-5-6</category><category>sol</category><category>usage-limits</category><category>pricing</category></item><item><title>Em que merchant of record confiar? Comparei 9</title><link>https://awaited.dev/pt/guides/choosing-a-merchant-of-record/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/pt/guides/choosing-a-merchant-of-record/</guid><description>A Paddle é a minha escolha de merchant of record, mas o preço não decide tudo. Comparei nove opções por comissões, avaliações, reservas e elegibilidade.</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/pt/guides/choosing-a-merchant-of-record.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>guides</category><category>merchant-of-record</category><category>payments</category><category>paddle</category><category>stripe</category><category>saas</category></item><item><title>DeepSeek V4 Flash perdeu para o Opus 4.8 nos 9 benchmarks</title><link>https://awaited.dev/pt/releases/deepseek-v4-flash-vs-opus-4-8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/pt/releases/deepseek-v4-flash-vs-opus-4-8/</guid><description>O V4 Flash custa 0,14 dólares à entrada e 0,28 à saída por milhão de tokens. Verifiquei se o desconto de 97 a 99% compensa perder os benchmarks.</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/pt/releases/deepseek-v4-flash-vs-opus-4-8.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>releases</category><category>deepseek</category><category>deepseek-v4-flash</category><category>opus-4-8</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>open-weights</category><category>pricing</category></item><item><title>Como conseguir os primeiros 1.000 utilizadores sem anúncios</title><link>https://awaited.dev/pt/guides/first-1000-users-without-paid-ads/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/pt/guides/first-1000-users-without-paid-ads/</guid><description>Analisei relatos de fundadores no Reddit e encontrei sete formas práticas de conquistar os primeiros utilizadores sem anúncios e onde a IA realmente ajuda.</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/pt/guides/first-1000-users-without-paid-ads.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>guides</category><category>distribution</category><category>organic-growth</category><category>startups</category><category>ai</category><category>saas</category></item><item><title>Pontuações próximas num benchmark escondem modelos diferentes</title><link>https://awaited.dev/pt/benchmarks/why-ai-benchmarks-miss-model-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/pt/benchmarks/why-ai-benchmarks-miss-model-quality/</guid><description>O DeepSWE põe Luna Max 2,2 pontos atrás de Sol High por cerca de um sexto do custo. Explico porque podem funcionar de forma tão diferente num repositório.</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/pt/benchmarks/why-ai-benchmarks-miss-model-quality.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>benchmarks</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>coding-agents</category><category>model-evaluation</category><category>gpt-5-6</category></item><item><title>Os meus agentes esquecem o repositório. Fiz-lhes um mapa</title><link>https://awaited.dev/pt/guides/context-management-for-coding-agents/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/pt/guides/context-management-for-coding-agents/</guid><description>Um sistema de gestão de contexto em quatro camadas orienta os meus agentes de programação para os factos atuais, mas manter o mapa certo ainda é difícil.</description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/pt/guides/context-management-for-coding-agents.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>guides</category><category>context-management</category><category>coding-agents</category><category>claude-code</category><category>agents-md</category><category>documentation</category><category>vibe-coding</category></item><item><title>Kimi K3 iguala o GPT-5.6, mas demora 4,6 vezes mais</title><link>https://awaited.dev/pt/benchmarks/kimi-k3-glm-5-2-hype-check/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/pt/benchmarks/kimi-k3-glm-5-2-hype-check/</guid><description>O Kimi K3 empata com o GPT-5.6 medium, mas demora 4,6 vezes mais. O GLM-5.2 é barato por token e caro por tarefa. Verifiquei onde ambos vencem.</description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/pt/benchmarks/kimi-k3-glm-5-2-hype-check.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>benchmarks</category><category>kimi-k3</category><category>glm-5-2</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>coding-agents</category><category>open-weights</category><category>pricing</category></item><item><title>GPT-5.6 vs Claude 5: porque é que os benchmarks divergem</title><link>https://awaited.dev/pt/benchmarks/gpt-5-6-vs-claude-5-benchmarks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/pt/benchmarks/gpt-5-6-vs-claude-5-benchmarks/</guid><description>Comparei Sol, Terra, Opus 5 e Fable 5 em benchmarks de programação. O vencedor muda conforme a tarefa, o esforço, a configuração do agente e o orçamento.</description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/pt/benchmarks/gpt-5-6-vs-claude-5-benchmarks.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>benchmarks</category><category>gpt-5-6</category><category>opus-5</category><category>fable-5</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>coding-agents</category><category>reasoning-effort</category></item><item><title>Comparei oito alternativas ao Convex. Não vou mudar</title><link>https://awaited.dev/pt/guides/convex-alternatives/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/pt/guides/convex-alternatives/</guid><description>O Appwrite e o InsForge chegaram mais perto, mas o backend TypeScript do Convex continua mais simples para os meus agentes. O alojamento na UE fica caro.</description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/pt/guides/convex-alternatives.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>guides</category><category>convex</category><category>supabase</category><category>appwrite</category><category>insforge</category><category>backend</category><category>vibe-coding</category></item><item><title>O GPT-5.6 Sol exagera na engenharia. Continuo a usá-lo</title><link>https://awaited.dev/pt/experiments/gpt-5-6-sol-overengineering/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/pt/experiments/gpt-5-6-sol-overengineering/</guid><description>Na minha auditoria, o GPT-5.6 Sol encontrou quase seis vezes mais problemas possíveis do que o Fable 5. A maioria falhou na triagem, por isso mudei de método.</description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/pt/experiments/gpt-5-6-sol-overengineering.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>experiments</category><category>gpt-5-6</category><category>sol</category><category>openai</category><category>codex</category><category>fable-5</category><category>multi-agent</category></item><item><title>O Opus 5 é um ótimo funcionário, mas um chefe frustrante</title><link>https://awaited.dev/pt/releases/opus-5-great-employee-bad-boss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://awaited.dev/pt/releases/opus-5-great-employee-bad-boss/</guid><description>O Opus 5 iguala o Fable 5 nos benchmarks por metade do preço por token, mas é difícil de supervisionar. Explico quando cada modelo compensa.</description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>A.M.</dc:creator><media:content url="https://awaited.dev/og/pt/releases/opus-5-great-employee-bad-boss.png" medium="image" type="image/png" width="1200" height="630"/><category>releases</category><category>opus-5</category><category>fable-5</category><category>anthropic</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>claude-code</category></item></channel></rss>